PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVSE vs. EMGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVSE vs. EMGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVSE achieves a 26.92% return, which is significantly lower than EMGF's 30.01% return.


AVSE

1D
-1.45%
1M
9.75%
YTD
26.92%
6M
28.98%
1Y
52.22%
3Y*
25.55%
5Y*
10Y*

EMGF

1D
-1.20%
1M
9.65%
YTD
30.01%
6M
32.52%
1Y
55.31%
3Y*
26.88%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
11.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVSE vs. EMGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
26.92%32.54%8.29%16.01%-13.85%
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
30.01%31.41%9.06%10.86%-13.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AVSE and EMGF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2022

0.97

The correlation between AVSE and EMGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVSE vs. EMGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVSE
EMGF

Technology

34.8%
34.7%

Financial Services

24.2%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.4%

Industrials

8.2%
7.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
7.4%

Healthcare

3.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.3%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.1%

Utilities

1.3%
2.5%

Energy

0.1%
4.3%

Technology

AVSE
34.8%
EMGF
34.7%

Financial Services

AVSE
24.2%
EMGF
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AVSE
12.3%
EMGF
10.4%

Industrials

AVSE
8.2%
EMGF
7.8%

Communication Services

AVSE
6.5%
EMGF
7.4%

Healthcare

AVSE
3.9%
EMGF
2.9%

Basic Materials

AVSE
3.3%
EMGF
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

AVSE
2.7%
EMGF
3.8%

Real Estate

AVSE
2.6%
EMGF
1.1%

Utilities

AVSE
1.3%
EMGF
2.5%

Energy

AVSE
0.1%
EMGF
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVSE vs. EMGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVSE
AVSE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EMGF
EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVSE vs. EMGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) and iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVSEEMGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.11

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.74

15.84

-1.11

AVSE vs. EMGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the EMGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVSE and EMGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVSEEMGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

2.78

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.57

+0.29

Drawdowns

AVSE vs. EMGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVSE drawdown since its inception was -26.28%, smaller than the maximum EMGF drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSE and EMGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSEEMGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.28%

-40.23%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.17%

-13.54%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-17.65%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.20%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-10.05%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

3.50%

+0.05%

Volatility

AVSE vs. EMGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVSE) is 8.65%, while iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that AVSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSEEMGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

9.20%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

17.50%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.53%

19.99%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

17.69%

+0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.48%

-1.45%

AVSE vs. EMGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVSE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EMGF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVSE vs. EMGF - Dividend Comparison

AVSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than EMGF's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVSE
Avantis Responsible Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.18%2.68%3.03%3.20%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.94%2.52%3.42%5.94%4.04%2.48%1.95%2.63%2.73%1.94%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AVSE and EMGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMGF has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to AVSE (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSE dropped -26.28% vs EMGF's -40.23%.

On 3-year performance, EMGF leads with 26.88% vs 25.55% for AVSE. On fees, AVSE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVSE has been the lower-risk option at 8.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 26.88% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

AVSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.94% for EMGF.

AVSE is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while EMGF is Emerging Markets Equities. AVSE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVSE and 0.45% for EMGF.

EMGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVSE and EMGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer