AVSC vs. VB
AVSC (Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. AVSC is actively managed, while VB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVSC returned 17.28%/yr vs 14.96%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVSC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
AVSC vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVSC achieves a 25.77% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 16.28% return.
AVSC
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- YTD
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 40.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VB
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
AVSC vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 25.77% | 9.42% | 7.75% | 19.68% | -12.40% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 16.28% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -15.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVSC and VB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AVSC and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVSC vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
AVSC
VB
AVSC vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVSC | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 2.84 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.14 | 10.37 | +5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVSC vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVSC drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVSC and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVSC | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -59.56% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -8.98% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -25.36% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.71% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -8.40% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.46% | +0.04% |
Volatility
AVSC vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF (AVSC) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVSC | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 3.38% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 12.07% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.71% | 16.47% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 20.74% | +1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 21.36% | +0.81% |
AVSC vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVSC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AVSC vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
AVSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVSC Avantis US Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.16% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, AVSC and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVSC has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VB (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVSC dropped -28.40% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 3-year performance, AVSC leads with 17.28% vs 14.96% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVSC has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 14.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVSC.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.91% for AVSC.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis Investors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AVSC and 0.05% for VB.
AVSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVSC and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer