PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVS vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVS vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVS achieves a -16.68% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's 3.44% return.


AVS

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.24%
YTD
-16.68%
6M
-15.57%
1Y
-40.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CARD

1D
-2.38%
1M
1.10%
YTD
3.44%
6M
15.94%
1Y
-32.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVS vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
-16.68%-45.96%-27.15%
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
3.44%-60.21%-35.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AVS and CARD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVS vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVS
AVS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
AVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
AVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVS vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVSCARDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.97

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.70

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

-1.02

-0.39

AVS vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVS Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the CARD Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVS and CARD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVS vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVS drawdown since its inception was -76.77%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVS and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVSCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.77%

-93.51%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.29%

-46.42%

-4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.72%

-92.23%

+20.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.51%

-68.74%

+19.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.24%

31.58%

-2.34%

Volatility

AVS vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares (AVS) is 20.67%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 23.68%. This indicates that AVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVSCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.67%

23.68%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.02%

52.62%

-19.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.66%

70.15%

-23.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.05%

80.69%

-26.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.05%

80.69%

-26.64%

AVS vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVS has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVS vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

AVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X Shares
3.48%4.22%1.63%
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVS and CARD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARD has higher volatility (23.68%) compared to AVS (20.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVS dropped -76.77% vs CARD's -93.51%.

On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -32.26% vs -40.93% for AVS. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AVS has been the lower-risk option at 20.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -32.26% return vs -40.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for AVS.

AVS has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for AVS and 0.95% for CARD.

CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVS and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer