AVRY vs. BDGS
AVRY (Avory Foundational ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVRY charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
AVRY vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVRY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 11.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVRY vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVRY Avory Foundational ETF | -9.69% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVRY and BDGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.62 |
AVRY vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVRY
BDGS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
AVRY
BDGS
Consumer Cyclical
AVRY
BDGS
Communication Services
AVRY
BDGS
Industrials
AVRY
BDGS
Financial Services
AVRY
BDGS
Healthcare
AVRY
BDGS
Utilities
AVRY
BDGS
Basic Materials
AVRY
-
BDGS
Consumer Defensive
AVRY
-
BDGS
Energy
AVRY
-
BDGS
Real Estate
AVRY
-
BDGS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVRY vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
AVRY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDGS
AVRY vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avory Foundational ETF (AVRY) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVRY | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVRY vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVRY drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVRY and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVRY | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.58% | -9.12% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.16% | -2.17% | -9.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -0.66% | -11.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility
AVRY vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVRY | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 6.38% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.32% | 8.22% | +20.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.32% | 8.22% | +20.10% |
AVRY vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVRY has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVRY vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
AVRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVRY Avory Foundational ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVRY and BDGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for AVRY.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for AVRY.
They also come from different issuers: Avory & Co. and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for AVRY and 0.87% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for AVRY and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer