AVOS vs. ACWV

Last updated Jul 19, 2026

AVOS (Avos Global Equities ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVOS is actively managed, while ACWV is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVOS charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.

Performance

AVOS vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AVOS

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWV

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 5.43%
• 10Y*: 6.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVOS vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF	8.70%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AVOS and ACWV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026	0.57

AVOS vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVOS	ACWV
Technology	21.2%	25.3%
Financial Services	18.6%	13.5%
Industrials	11.7%	8.1%
Healthcare	8.8%	13.8%
Communication Services	8.4%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	5.3%
Energy	7.3%	3.5%
Basic Materials	6.3%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	9.7%
Utilities	3.0%	7.5%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.6%

Return for Risk

AVOS vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 24
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVOS vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avos Global Equities ETF (AVOS) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVOS	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.54	—

Drawdowns

AVOS vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVOS drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVOS and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVOS	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	-28.82%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-1.92%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-3.11%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.23%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVOS	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	8.02%	+9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.62%	10.28%	+7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	12.29%	+5.33%

AVOS vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVOS has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVOS vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

AVOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.94%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
AVOS Avos Global Equities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVOS and ACWV in my portfolio?

AVOS and ACWV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVOS or ACWV?

On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVOS or ACWV?

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AVOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVOS or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for AVOS.

What is the main difference between AVOS and ACWV?

They also come from different issuers: Avos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for AVOS and 0.20% for ACWV.