PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVNV vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVNV vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNV achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.73% return.


AVNV

1D
-0.61%
1M
-2.96%
6M
6.35%
YTD
10.82%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.54%
6M
15.77%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
33.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNV vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVNV and IFLO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.89

The correlation between AVNV and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNV vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVNV
IFLO

Financial Services

23.2%
1.1%

Industrials

18.1%
18.1%

Basic Materials

13.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
13.8%

Technology

10.4%
21.5%

Energy

9.6%
12.1%

Communication Services

4.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.8%

Healthcare

3.2%
11.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.0%

Utilities

1.3%
1.0%

Financial Services

AVNV
23.2%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

AVNV
18.1%
IFLO
18.1%

Basic Materials

AVNV
13.8%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVNV
11.4%
IFLO
13.8%

Technology

AVNV
10.4%
IFLO
21.5%

Energy

AVNV
9.6%
IFLO
12.1%

Communication Services

AVNV
4.3%
IFLO
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

AVNV
3.3%
IFLO
2.8%

Healthcare

AVNV
3.2%
IFLO
11.7%

Real Estate

AVNV
1.4%
IFLO
0.0%

Utilities

AVNV
1.3%
IFLO
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVNV vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNV
AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNV vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVNVIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

5.17

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.51

17.35

-8.84

AVNV vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNV Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNV and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVNV vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNV drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNV and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVNVIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.89%

-6.44%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-6.44%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-1.89%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.51%

-1.30%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

1.92%

+1.26%

Volatility

AVNV vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.18%. This indicates that AVNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVNVIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

3.18%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

12.01%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

14.55%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

14.51%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

14.51%

+0.51%

AVNV vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVNV vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

AVNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVNV
Avantis All International Markets Value ETF
2.68%3.14%3.51%1.64%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.57%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVNV and IFLO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVNV has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to IFLO (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNV dropped -13.89% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.15% vs 27.00% for AVNV. On fees, AVNV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 27.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVNV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

AVNV has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for AVNV and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVNV and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer