AVNV vs. FID

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AVNV (Avantis All International Markets Value ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNV is actively managed, while FID is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNV returned 36.33% vs 22.92% for FID. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVNV charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.

Performance

AVNV vs. FID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNV achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than FID's 9.08% return.

AVNV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 17.59%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FID

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 9.08%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 22.92%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNV vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	14.54%	39.93%	5.43%	9.62%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	9.08%	32.07%	5.42%	8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNV and FID is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.84

The correlation between AVNV and FID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNV vs. FID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNV	FID
Financial Services	24.2%	20.8%
Industrials	17.5%	13.5%
Basic Materials	14.2%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	4.0%
Energy	10.4%	8.0%
Technology	8.6%	4.1%
Communication Services	4.3%	11.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	3.7%
Healthcare	3.3%	3.5%
Real Estate	1.6%	9.4%
Utilities	1.5%	17.4%

Return for Risk

AVNV vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNV

AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 73
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FID

FID Risk / Return Rank: 63
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNV vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNV	FID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.27	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	3.22	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.40	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	2.58	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.12	9.00	+3.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNV vs. FID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNV Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FID Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNV and FID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNV	FID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.27	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.40	+1.20

Drawdowns

AVNV vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNV drawdown since its inception was -13.89%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNV and FID.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNV	FID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.89%	-39.79%	+25.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-8.93%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.78%	-0.64%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-8.47%	+5.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.55%	+0.45%

Volatility

AVNV vs. FID - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) at 2.98%. This indicates that AVNV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNV	FID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	2.98%	+1.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	8.13%	+4.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.52%	10.16%	+4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	17.04%	-2.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.77%	18.95%	-4.18%

AVNV vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNV has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNV vs. FID - Dividend Comparison

AVNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than FID's 4.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVNV Avantis All International Markets Value ETF	2.85%	3.14%	3.51%	1.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.00%	4.30%	4.31%	4.19%	4.22%	3.76%	3.91%	3.70%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNV and FID in my portfolio?

AVNV and FID have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNV or FID?

AVNV has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to FID (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNV dropped -13.89% vs FID's -39.79%.

Which ETF is better, AVNV or FID?

On 1-year performance, AVNV leads with 36.33% vs 22.92% for FID. On fees, AVNV is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNV or FID?

Over the 1-year period, AVNV has performed better with a 36.33% return vs 22.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNV or FID?

AVNV is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNV or FID?

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 2.85% for AVNV.

What is the main difference between AVNV and FID?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for AVNV and 0.60% for FID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.