AVNM vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNM is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 35.92% vs 53.55% for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

AVNM vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.49% return.

AVNM

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 6M: 17.96%
• 1Y: 35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 14.49%
• YTD: 32.49%
• 6M: 35.58%
• 1Y: 53.55%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	14.81%	38.30%	5.52%	8.60%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.49%	26.65%	4.67%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and UMMA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.83

The correlation between AVNM and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVNM	UMMA
Financial Services	23.2%	-
Industrials	17.1%	13.5%
Technology	12.5%	42.9%
Basic Materials	11.7%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	8.1%
Energy	8.3%	2.9%
Healthcare	4.4%	16.6%
Communication Services	4.3%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	5.6%
Utilities	2.9%	-
Real Estate	1.7%	0.5%

Return for Risk

AVNM vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM

AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 69
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 75
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVNM	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.68	-0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.53	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.46	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	3.60	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	14.07	-1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVNM vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVNM	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.68	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.54	0.58	+0.96

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVNM	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-34.17%	+20.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.59%	-14.93%	+3.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.77%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.55%	-9.82%	+7.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.82%	-0.86%

Volatility

AVNM vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) is 5.19%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that AVNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVNM	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	7.64%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	17.26%	-4.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.82%	20.10%	-5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	20.55%	-5.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	20.55%	-5.69%

AVNM vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVNM vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than UMMA's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF	2.51%	2.76%	3.51%	1.69%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVNM and UMMA in my portfolio?

AVNM and UMMA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVNM or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to AVNM (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, AVNM or UMMA?

On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 53.55% vs 35.92% for AVNM. On fees, AVNM is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, AVNM has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVNM or UMMA?

Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 53.55% return vs 35.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVNM or UMMA?

AVNM is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVNM or UMMA?

AVNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between AVNM and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.