PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVNM vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVNM vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.73% return.


AVNM

1D
-0.68%
1M
-3.06%
6M
6.97%
YTD
11.42%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.54%
6M
15.77%
YTD
18.73%
1Y
33.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVNM vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVNM and IFLO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.87

The correlation between AVNM and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVNM vs. IFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVNM
IFLO

Financial Services

22.5%
1.1%

Industrials

17.1%
18.1%

Technology

15.0%
21.5%

Basic Materials

11.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
13.8%

Energy

7.7%
12.1%

Communication Services

4.4%
6.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.8%

Utilities

2.6%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

AVNM
22.5%
IFLO
1.1%

Industrials

AVNM
17.1%
IFLO
18.1%

Technology

AVNM
15.0%
IFLO
21.5%

Basic Materials

AVNM
11.4%
IFLO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

AVNM
9.9%
IFLO
13.8%

Energy

AVNM
7.7%
IFLO
12.1%

Communication Services

AVNM
4.4%
IFLO
6.7%

Healthcare

AVNM
4.2%
IFLO
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

AVNM
3.7%
IFLO
2.8%

Utilities

AVNM
2.6%
IFLO
1.0%

Real Estate

AVNM
1.5%
IFLO
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVNM vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVNM
AVNM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVNM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AVNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVNM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVNM vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVNMIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

5.17

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

17.35

-8.78

AVNM vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVNM and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVNM vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVNMIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.03%

-6.44%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-6.44%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.06%

-1.89%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-1.30%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.92%

+1.19%

Volatility

AVNM vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 3.18%. This indicates that AVNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVNMIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

3.18%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

12.01%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

14.55%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

14.51%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

14.51%

+0.63%

AVNM vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVNM vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than IFLO's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVNM
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF
2.40%2.76%3.51%1.69%
IFLO
VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
1.57%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVNM and IFLO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVNM has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to IFLO (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 33.15% vs 26.58% for AVNM. On fees, AVNM is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 33.15% return vs 26.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVNM is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

AVNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.57% for IFLO.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for AVNM and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVNM and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer