AVNM vs. FZILX
AVNM (Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF) and FZILX (Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. AVNM is actively managed, while FZILX is passively managed. Over the past year, AVNM returned 32.61% vs 34.40% for FZILX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AVNM charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FZILX.
Performance
AVNM vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVNM achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 16.56% return.
AVNM
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 32.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FZILX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 16.56%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 34.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
AVNM vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF | 12.75% | 38.30% | 5.52% | 8.60% |
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund | 16.56% | 33.52% | 5.32% | 6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVNM and FZILX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between AVNM and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVNM vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank
AVNM
FZILX
AVNM vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVNM | FZILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.16 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 12.17 | -1.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVNM vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVNM drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum FZILX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVNM and FZILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVNM | FZILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -34.37% | +20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -11.24% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | 0.00% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.54% | -6.66% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.91% | +0.10% |
Volatility
AVNM vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison
Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF (AVNM) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) at 6.35%. This indicates that AVNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVNM | FZILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 6.35% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 13.48% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.98% | 15.60% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 15.72% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 17.38% | -2.20% |
AVNM vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVNM has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVNM vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison
AVNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FZILX's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVNM Avantis All International Markets Equity ETF | 3.61% | 2.76% | 3.51% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund | 2.29% | 2.67% | 3.00% | 2.98% | 2.71% | 2.61% | 1.64% | 2.37% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AVNM and FZILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVNM has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to FZILX (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVNM dropped -14.03% vs FZILX's -34.37%.
FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVNM and FZILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer