AVMU vs. IBMN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AVMU (Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF) and IBMN (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. AVMU is actively managed, while IBMN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVMU returned 0.97%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for IBMN. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVMU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMN.

Performance

AVMU vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AVMU

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 8.38%
• 3Y*: 3.73%
• 5Y*: 0.97%
• 10Y*: —

IBMN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 1.26%
• 3Y*: 2.44%
• 5Y*: 0.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMU vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF	1.64%	3.87%	1.72%	5.18%	-7.33%	0.27%	0.19%
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	2.49%	2.33%	2.42%	-4.43%	-0.41%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMU and IBMN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020	0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between AVMU and IBMN has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AVMU vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMU

AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 70
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 87
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 52

IBMN

IBMN Risk / Return Rank: 71
IBMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IBMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
IBMN Omega Ratio Rank: 94
IBMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
IBMN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMU vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVMU	IBMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.22	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.67	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.69	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	1.58	+0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	16.58	-7.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVMU vs. IBMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the IBMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMU and IBMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVMU	IBMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.22	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.30	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.58	-0.35

Drawdowns

AVMU vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, roughly equal to the maximum IBMN drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and IBMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVMU	IBMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.41%	-12.40%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.32%	-0.25%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.38%	-1.10%	-5.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.41%	-7.36%	-5.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	-0.05%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.77%	-1.81%	-1.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.10%	+0.78%

Volatility

AVMU vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) at 0.00%. This indicates that AVMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVMU	IBMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	0.00%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.32%	0.50%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29%	0.71%	+2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.13%	1.80%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.99%	3.89%	+0.10%

AVMU vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVMU vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison

AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than IBMN's 1.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVMU Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF	3.22%	3.50%	3.32%	2.50%	1.29%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF	1.14%	2.03%	2.03%	1.72%	0.97%	0.70%	1.11%	1.65%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVMU and IBMN in my portfolio?

AVMU and IBMN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVMU or IBMN?

AVMU has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to IBMN (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMU dropped -12.41% vs IBMN's -12.40%.

Which ETF is better, AVMU or IBMN?

On 5-year performance, AVMU leads with 0.97% vs 0.51% for IBMN. On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IBMN has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVMU or IBMN?

Over the 5-year period, AVMU has performed better with a 0.97% return vs 0.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVMU or IBMN?

AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVMU or IBMN?

AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.14% for IBMN.

What is the main difference between AVMU and IBMN?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.18% for IBMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.