PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMU vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVMU vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.


AVMU

1D
0.15%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.64%
6M
2.78%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.97%
10Y*

DBE

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
79.50%
6M
72.59%
1Y
82.31%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
19.20%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMU vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
1.64%3.87%1.72%5.18%-7.33%0.27%0.19%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.50%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMU and DBE is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020

-0.09

The correlation between AVMU and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVMU vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMU
AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMU vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVMUDBEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.58

2.37

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.91

2.91

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.39

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

6.10

-3.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.05

11.98

-2.93

AVMU vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMU and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVMUDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.37

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.66

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.09

+0.14

Drawdowns

AVMU vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMUDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-86.69%

+74.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-14.41%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.38%

-23.89%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

-38.74%

+26.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-31.85%

+31.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-57.31%

+53.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

7.34%

-6.46%

Volatility

AVMU vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) is 1.19%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that AVMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVMUDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

13.47%

-12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

30.80%

-28.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

35.02%

-31.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.13%

29.37%

-25.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

28.33%

-24.34%

AVMU vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVMU vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DBE's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
3.22%3.50%3.32%2.50%1.29%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.15%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVMU and DBE have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to AVMU (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMU dropped -12.41% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.20% vs 0.97% for AVMU. On fees, AVMU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVMU has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.20% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

AVMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.15% for DBE.

AVMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVMU and 0.78% for DBE.

AVMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVMU and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer