PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMU vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVMU vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVMU vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
-0.35%3.87%1.72%5.18%-7.33%0.27%0.19%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
-0.44%4.34%1.88%5.96%-7.43%1.58%0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMU achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's -0.44% return.


AVMU

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

JMUB

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVMU vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AVMU vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMU
AVMU Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AVMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMU Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMU Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMU vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVMUJMUBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.07

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.11

-0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

4.20

-1.30

AVMU vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMU and JMUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVMUJMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.07

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.36

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.69

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between AVMU and JMUB is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AVMU vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

AVMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than JMUB's 3.60% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVMU
Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF
3.56%3.50%3.32%2.50%1.29%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.60%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%

Drawdowns

AVMU vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMU drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, roughly equal to the maximum JMUB drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMU and JMUB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMUJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-12.50%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-3.47%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.41%

-12.06%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-2.26%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-2.54%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.92%

+0.66%

Volatility

AVMU vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Core Municipal Fixed Income ETF (AVMU) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 1.23%. This indicates that AVMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVMUJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

1.23%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

1.64%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35%

3.41%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

3.30%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

4.17%

-0.17%