PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMC vs. XJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVMC vs. XJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVMC vs. XJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
3.02%9.98%16.84%15.39%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
2.75%8.12%12.27%16.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMC achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than XJH's 2.75% return.


AVMC

1D
0.54%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
3.02%
6M
4.94%
1Y
18.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XJH

1D
0.90%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
2.75%
6M
5.01%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVMC vs. XJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XJH's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

AVMC vs. XJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMC
AVMC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XJH
XJH Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMC vs. XJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVMCXJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

0.85

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.06

5.54

+0.52

AVMC vs. XJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the XJH Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMC and XJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVMCXJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

0.85

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.67

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between AVMC and XJH is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

AVMC vs. XJH - Dividend Comparison

AVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XJH's 1.22% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.12%1.02%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.24%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.04%0.36%

Drawdowns

AVMC vs. XJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMC drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum XJH drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMC and XJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMCXJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-25.07%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-14.02%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-5.95%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-6.99%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.37%

-0.32%

Volatility

AVMC vs. XJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) is 5.45%, while iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that AVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVMCXJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

6.71%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

12.27%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

21.39%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

19.89%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

19.99%

-2.77%