AVMC vs. VOT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AVMC (Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. AVMC is actively managed, while VOT is passively managed. Over the past year, AVMC returned 24.86% vs 13.33% for VOT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVMC charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

AVMC vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMC achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 10.04% return.

AVMC

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 13.20%
• 6M: 11.34%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOT

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 7.76%
• 1Y: 13.33%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: 12.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMC vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	13.20%	9.98%	16.84%	14.02%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	10.04%	10.72%	16.38%	14.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMC and VOT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.87

The correlation between AVMC and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVMC vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVMC	VOT
Industrials	19.3%	23.2%
Financial Services	15.8%	6.9%
Technology	14.6%	32.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	12.8%
Healthcare	10.2%	8.9%
Energy	8.5%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	0.8%
Utilities	5.3%	3.2%
Basic Materials	5.3%	1.6%
Communication Services	2.7%	3.6%
Real Estate	0.6%	4.5%

Return for Risk

AVMC vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMC

AVMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
AVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
AVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 21
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 21
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMC vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVMC	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	0.80	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	1.20	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.14	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	0.84	+2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	2.50	+9.26

AVMC vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMC and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVMC vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMC drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMC and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVMC	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.84%	-60.16%	+38.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.90%	-15.96%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	0.00%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-9.94%	+6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	5.35%	-3.23%

Volatility

AVMC vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) is 4.05%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that AVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVMC	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	6.71%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	13.56%	-3.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	16.83%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.96%	21.51%	-4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.96%	21.07%	-4.11%

AVMC vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVMC vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

AVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than VOT's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVMC Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.21%	1.12%	1.02%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVMC and VOT in my portfolio?

AVMC and VOT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVMC or VOT?

VOT has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to AVMC (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMC dropped -21.84% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which ETF is better, AVMC or VOT?

On 1-year performance, AVMC leads with 24.86% vs 13.33% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, AVMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVMC or VOT?

Over the 1-year period, AVMC has performed better with a 24.86% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVMC or VOT?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AVMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVMC or VOT?

AVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.60% for VOT.

What is the main difference between AVMC and VOT?

AVMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AVMC and 0.05% for VOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.