PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMC vs. SRHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMC achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 18.97% return.


AVMC

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.20%
6M
8.53%
YTD
12.90%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SRHQ

1D
0.69%
1M
4.38%
6M
14.78%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
27.17%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
12.90%9.98%16.84%14.02%
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
18.97%7.34%16.49%11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMC and SRHQ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.88

The correlation between AVMC and SRHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVMC
SRHQ

Industrials

18.9%
19.9%

Financial Services

15.8%
9.6%

Technology

15.1%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
13.9%

Healthcare

10.2%
21.5%

Energy

8.7%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
3.0%

Utilities

5.3%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.2%

Industrials

AVMC
18.9%
SRHQ
19.9%

Financial Services

AVMC
15.8%
SRHQ
9.6%

Technology

AVMC
15.1%
SRHQ
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AVMC
11.0%
SRHQ
13.9%

Healthcare

AVMC
10.2%
SRHQ
21.5%

Energy

AVMC
8.7%
SRHQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

AVMC
6.8%
SRHQ
5.5%

Basic Materials

AVMC
5.6%
SRHQ
3.0%

Utilities

AVMC
5.3%
SRHQ
1.2%

Communication Services

AVMC
1.9%
SRHQ
2.0%

Real Estate

AVMC
0.6%
SRHQ
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVMC vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMC
AVMC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SRHQ
SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVMCSRHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.33

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

15.14

-6.12

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SRHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMC and SRHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMC drawdown since its inception was -21.84%, which is greater than SRHQ's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMC and SRHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMCSRHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.84%

-18.50%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-6.31%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.39%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-3.01%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.80%

+0.32%

Volatility

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) is 3.63%, while SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that AVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVMCSRHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.95%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

10.97%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

14.87%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.97%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

15.97%

+0.86%

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVMC vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

AVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than SRHQ's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
0.95%1.12%1.02%0.24%0.00%
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
0.70%0.76%0.66%0.84%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVMC and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRHQ has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to AVMC (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMC dropped -21.84% vs SRHQ's -18.50%.

On 1-year performance, SRHQ leads with 27.17% vs 19.06% for AVMC. On fees, AVMC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AVMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SRHQ has performed better with a 27.17% return vs 19.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SRHQ.

AVMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.70% for SRHQ.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AVMC and 0.35% for SRHQ.

SRHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVMC and SRHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer