AVLC vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AVLC (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AVLC is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past year, AVLC returned 34.32% vs 34.12% for IUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

AVLC vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVLC having a 15.30% return and IUS slightly higher at 15.78%.

AVLC

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IUS

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 34.12%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVLC vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	15.30%	17.57%	22.82%	12.05%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	15.78%	16.94%	16.51%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLC and IUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.92

The correlation between AVLC and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLC vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVLC	IUS
Technology	32.6%	22.4%
Financial Services	13.1%	6.8%
Industrials	10.8%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.7%
Communication Services	8.7%	14.7%
Energy	7.3%	10.9%
Healthcare	7.2%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	7.4%
Utilities	2.7%	1.0%
Basic Materials	2.3%	3.3%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.5%

Return for Risk

AVLC vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVLC

AVLC Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
AVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 92
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVLC vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVLC	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	3.34	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	4.63	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.61	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	5.59	-1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.29	23.97	-3.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVLC vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLC and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVLC	IUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	3.34	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.85	+0.83

Drawdowns

AVLC vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLC and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVLC	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-34.67%	+15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-6.15%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-3.87%	+1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.43%	+0.30%

Volatility

AVLC vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.58%. This indicates that AVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVLC	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	2.58%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	7.45%	+1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.40%	10.26%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	15.00%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.70%	18.04%	-2.34%

AVLC vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AVLC vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

AVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.78%	0.92%	1.09%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.28%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVLC and IUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, AVLC and IUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVLC or IUS?

AVLC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to IUS (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLC dropped -19.64% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, AVLC or IUS?

On 1-year performance, AVLC leads with 34.32% vs 34.12% for IUS. On fees, AVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVLC or IUS?

Over the 1-year period, AVLC has performed better with a 34.32% return vs 34.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVLC or IUS?

AVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVLC or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.78% for AVLC.

What is the main difference between AVLC and IUS?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLC and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.