AVL vs. NVDG
AVL (Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVL returned 167.73% vs 83.14% for NVDG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
AVL vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a 72.10% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's 18.93% return.
AVL
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 29.70%
- YTD
- 72.10%
- 6M
- 38.64%
- 1Y
- 167.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDG
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 83.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVL vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 72.10% | 54.38% | 3.83% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.93% | 32.45% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVL and NVDG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between AVL and NVDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVL vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
AVL
NVDG
AVL vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVL | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 1.96 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 4.44 | +2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVL | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.24 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.40 | +0.78 |
Drawdowns
AVL vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVL | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.63% | -66.19% | -4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.69% | -42.72% | -10.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -18.34% | +17.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -23.07% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.00% | 18.77% | +5.23% |
Volatility
AVL vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) is 23.46%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that AVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVL | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.46% | 25.14% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.68% | 50.15% | +11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.76% | 67.81% | +17.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.25% | 90.72% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.25% | 90.72% | +14.53% |
AVL vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVL vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.16%, more than NVDG's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 17.16% | 29.04% | 0.22% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.93% | 11.81% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVL and NVDG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to AVL (23.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVL dropped -70.63% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, AVL leads with 167.73% vs 83.14% for NVDG. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AVL has been the lower-risk option at 23.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVL has performed better with a 167.73% return vs 83.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.
AVL has the higher dividend yield at 17.16%, compared with 9.93% for NVDG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 0.75% for NVDG.
AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVL and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer