AVL vs. MUU
AVL (Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. AVL is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVL charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
AVL vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AVL
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -20.41%
- YTD
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 64.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVL vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | -8.09% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVL and MUU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVL vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
AVL
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVL vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVL vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.63% | -26.28% | -44.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.86% | -26.28% | -14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.80% | -10.19% | -13.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.34% | — | — |
Volatility
AVL vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVL | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 45.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.91% | 295.32% | -202.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.82% | 295.32% | -187.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.82% | 295.32% | -187.50% |
AVL vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVL vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.73%, while MUU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 28.73% | 29.04% | 0.22% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVL and MUU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.
AVL has the higher dividend yield at 28.73%, compared with 0.00% for MUU.
Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for AVL and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer