AVL vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVL (Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVL returned 64.93% vs -73.99% for CRMG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

AVL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.

AVL

• 1D: -6.83%
• 1M: -20.41%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 64.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: 4.23%
• 1M: -29.64%
• YTD: -71.26%
• 6M: -71.01%
• 1Y: -73.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares	2.77%	301.09%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-71.26%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AVL and CRMG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

AVL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVL

AVL Risk / Return Rank: 25
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVL	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	-0.97	+1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	-1.82	+3.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.79	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	-0.97	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.57	-1.70	+4.27

AVL vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVL and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVL	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.63%	-79.83%	+9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.69%	-76.80%	+23.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.86%	-78.97%	+38.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.80%	-39.18%	+15.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.34%	43.41%	-18.07%

Volatility

AVL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) has a higher volatility of 45.26% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) at 32.53%. This indicates that AVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVL	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	45.26%	32.53%	+12.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.56%	63.74%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.91%	76.12%	+16.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	107.82%	75.39%	+32.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	107.82%	75.39%	+32.43%

AVL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.73%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares	28.73%	29.04%	0.22%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVL and CRMG in my portfolio?

AVL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVL or CRMG?

AVL has higher volatility (45.26%) compared to CRMG (32.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVL dropped -70.63% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

Which ETF is better, AVL or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, AVL leads with 64.93% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 32.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVL or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, AVL has performed better with a 64.93% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVL or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVL or CRMG?

AVL has the higher dividend yield at 28.73%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between AVL and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.