PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGX vs. NRGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGX achieves a 6.63% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 111.49% return.


AVGX

1D
-15.71%
1M
-21.92%
YTD
6.63%
6M
-18.71%
1Y
57.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRGU

1D
-6.40%
1M
4.99%
YTD
111.49%
6M
82.61%
1Y
156.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGX and NRGU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

-0.00

The correlation between AVGX and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGXNRGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

3.94

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

9.76

-7.40

AVGX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGX and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGXNRGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

2.10

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.35

+0.34

Drawdowns

AVGX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGX drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGX and NRGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGXNRGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.97%

-57.50%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.09%

-39.95%

-14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.76%

-27.06%

-10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.75%

-25.41%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.36%

16.10%

+8.26%

Volatility

AVGX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a higher volatility of 41.78% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 26.47%. This indicates that AVGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGXNRGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.78%

26.47%

+15.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.71%

61.54%

+9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.02%

75.00%

+16.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.93%

89.08%

+17.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.93%

89.08%

+17.85%

AVGX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

AVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGX and NRGU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGX has higher volatility (41.78%) compared to NRGU (26.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGX dropped -70.97% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.47% vs 57.26% for AVGX. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 26.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.47% return vs 57.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AVGX.

AVGX has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AVGX and 0.95% for NRGU.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGX and NRGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer