PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGX vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVGX vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVGX vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
-23.54%46.98%69.92%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN
-6.09%796.47%-39.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGX achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than GDXU's -6.09% return.


AVGX

1D
2.46%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-23.54%
6M
-25.44%
1Y
143.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXU

1D
13.62%
1M
-51.51%
YTD
-6.09%
6M
8.92%
1Y
287.76%
3Y*
63.33%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVGX vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AVGX vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGX vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGXGDXUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.07

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

2.39

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.87

-1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.27

10.85

-4.58

AVGX vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGX and GDXU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGXGDXUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.07

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.01

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between AVGX and GDXU is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AVGX vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

AVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AVGX vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGX drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGX and GDXU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGXGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.97%

-94.39%

+23.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.09%

-73.16%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.77%

-56.42%

+8.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.64%

-69.97%

+46.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.31%

26.08%

-2.77%

Volatility

AVGX vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) is 25.01%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 53.09%. This indicates that AVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVGXGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.01%

53.09%

-28.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.23%

122.23%

-57.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.98%

140.32%

-44.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.59%

109.02%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.59%

109.02%

-2.43%