AVGW vs. SMH
AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. AVGW is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
AVGW vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGW achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 69.83% return.
AVGW
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- -17.77%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 69.83%
- 6M
- 67.17%
- 1Y
- 120.36%
- 3Y*
- 59.95%
- 5Y*
- 37.82%
- 10Y*
- 37.67%
AVGW vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 3.41% | 20.48% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 69.83% | 26.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGW and SMH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.68 |
AVGW vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVGW
SMH
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AVGW
SMH
Basic Materials
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Energy
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Industrials
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Utilities
AVGW
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGW vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
AVGW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
AVGW vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.52 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGW vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGW drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGW and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -84.96% | +50.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.10% | -8.57% | -20.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -40.99% | +28.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.17% | — |
Volatility
AVGW vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGW | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.16% | 35.07% | +22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.16% | 35.88% | +21.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.16% | 32.98% | +24.18% |
AVGW vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGW vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
AVGW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.78%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 66.78% | 31.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGW and SMH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AVGW.
AVGW has the higher dividend yield at 66.78%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
AVGW is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AVGW and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for AVGW and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer