AVGV vs. PID

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVGV is actively managed, while PID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVGV returned 20.17%/yr vs 13.44%/yr for PID. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AVGV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.

Performance

AVGV vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 7.78% return.

AVGV

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 11.09%
• YTD: 19.44%
• 1Y: 35.33%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.39%

PID

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 4.32%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 1Y: 17.32%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 8.89%
• ALL TIME*: 5.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	$5.38M	$4.64M	$3.97M
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	$1.30M	$1.82M	$1.51M

AVGV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	19.44%	22.57%	11.26%	11.88%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	7.78%	24.45%	3.08%	5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGV and PID is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.74

The correlation between AVGV and PID shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVGV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVGV	PID
Financial Services	24.0%	18.7%
Industrials	16.3%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	6.5%
Technology	11.8%	8.5%
Energy	11.5%	10.4%
Basic Materials	6.6%	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	7.1%
Communication Services	4.8%	13.5%
Healthcare	4.3%	8.6%
Real Estate	0.7%	0.5%
Utilities	0.6%	14.6%

Return for Risk

AVGV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 93
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 70
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVGV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGV	PID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.79	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	2.63	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.32	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	2.33	+2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.10	7.38	+9.73

AVGV vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGV and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVGV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and PID.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGV	PID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.03%	-66.34%	+49.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-7.47%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.03%	-11.39%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.34%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-12.95%	+10.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.35%	-0.28%

Volatility

AVGV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.49%. This indicates that AVGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGV	PID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	2.49%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	7.84%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	9.76%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.87%	13.92%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	17.57%	-2.70%

AVGV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than PID's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF	1.60%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.46%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGV and PID in my portfolio?

AVGV and PID have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGV or PID?

AVGV has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to PID (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs PID's -66.34%.

Which ETF is better, AVGV or PID?

On 3-year performance, AVGV leads with 20.17% vs 13.44% for PID. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVGV or PID?

Over the 3-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGV or PID?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGV or PID?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 1.60% for AVGV.

What is the main difference between AVGV and PID?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.56% for PID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.