AVGU vs. XTJL
AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVGU returned 42.21% vs 13.87% for XTJL. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
AVGU vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AVGU having a 6.23% return and XTJL slightly lower at 6.07%.
AVGU
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 1Y
- 42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGU vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF | 6.23% | 33.87% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.07% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGU and XTJL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGU vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
AVGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
AVGU vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGU vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -23.24% | -30.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.30% | -5.12% | -48.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.05% | -0.28% | -38.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -3.96% | -17.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
AVGU vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGU | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.18% | 7.39% | +86.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 15.10% | +79.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 15.06% | +79.12% |
AVGU vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGU vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVGU nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGU and XTJL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, AVGU leads with 42.21% vs 13.87% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVGU has performed better with a 42.21% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.
AVGU and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for AVGU and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer