AVGU vs. LABU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AVGU is actively managed, while LABU is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGU returned 29.66% vs 286.59% for LABU. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for LABU.

Performance

AVGU vs. LABU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than LABU's 59.86% return.

AVGU

• 1D: -10.31%
• 1M: -4.67%
• 6M: -0.30%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 1Y: 29.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LABU

• 1D: -8.20%
• 1M: 38.01%
• 6M: 52.81%
• YTD: 59.86%
• 1Y: 286.59%
• 3Y*: 26.50%
• 5Y*: -26.07%
• 10Y*: -9.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGU vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF	-2.35%	33.87%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	59.86%	137.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGU and LABU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

AVGU vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGU

AVGU Risk / Return Rank: 19
AVGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
AVGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
AVGU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
AVGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
AVGU Martin Ratio Rank: 16

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 93
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 85
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGU vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGU	LABU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	3.64	-3.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	3.41	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.41	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	9.40	-8.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	26.08	-24.99

AVGU vs. LABU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the LABU Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGU and LABU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVGU vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and LABU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGU	LABU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.30%	-99.18%	+45.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.30%	-30.70%	-22.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-78.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.97%	-94.37%	+50.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-81.78%	+59.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.23%	11.05%	+16.18%

Volatility

AVGU vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) has a higher volatility of 29.85% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) at 25.26%. This indicates that AVGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGU	LABU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.85%	25.26%	+4.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.64%	63.83%	+6.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	94.62%	79.41%	+15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.43%	96.05%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.43%	95.22%	-0.79%

AVGU vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LABU's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGU vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison

AVGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.40%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGU and LABU in my portfolio?

AVGU and LABU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGU or LABU?

AVGU has higher volatility (29.85%) compared to LABU (25.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGU dropped -53.30% vs LABU's -99.18%.

Which ETF is better, AVGU or LABU?

On 1-year performance, LABU leads with 286.59% vs 29.66% for AVGU. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, LABU has been the lower-risk option at 25.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVGU or LABU?

Over the 1-year period, LABU has performed better with a 286.59% return vs 29.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGU or LABU?

LABU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGU or LABU?

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for AVGU.

What is the main difference between AVGU and LABU?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 0.96% for LABU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.