AVGO vs. ALMU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) and ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, AVGO returned 67.17%/yr vs 113.21%/yr for ALMU. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AVGO vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than ALMU's 46.77% return.

AVGO

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -10.14%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 6.58%
• 1Y: 54.87%
• 3Y*: 67.17%
• 5Y*: 55.09%
• 10Y*: 40.96%

ALMU

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 46.77%
• 6M: 38.84%
• 1Y: 88.27%
• 3Y*: 113.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGO vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	10.62%	50.63%	110.49%	104.18%	7.51%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	46.77%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and ALMU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022	0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap AVGO : $1.86T ALMU : $437.33M
EPS AVGO : $6.01 ALMU : -$0.36
PS Ratio AVGO : 24.70 ALMU : 81.48
PB Ratio AVGO : 21.24 ALMU : 10.91
Total Revenue (TTM) AVGO : $75.47B ALMU : $5.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) AVGO : $50.53B ALMU : $2.17M
EBITDA (TTM) AVGO : $41.76B ALMU : -$6.01M

Return for Risk

AVGO vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO

AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 74
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 62
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVGO	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	0.36	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.50	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	0.85	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	1.62	+2.49

AVGO vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and ALMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum ALMU drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGO	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.30%	-55.37%	+7.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.67%	-55.37%	+26.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.15%	-55.37%	+14.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.66%	-19.97%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-23.50%	+15.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.30%	29.25%	-16.95%

Volatility

AVGO vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) is 20.53%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 44.76%. This indicates that AVGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGO	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.53%	44.76%	-24.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.04%	95.20%	-60.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.57%	130.67%	-85.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.39%	123.75%	-80.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.52%	123.75%	-84.23%

Dividends

AVGO vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AVGO Broadcom Inc.	0.65%	0.70%	0.94%	1.71%	3.02%	2.24%	3.05%	3.54%	3.11%	1.87%	1.43%	1.13%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGO and ALMU in my portfolio?

AVGO and ALMU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGO or ALMU?

ALMU has higher volatility (44.76%) compared to AVGO (20.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs ALMU's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.