PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGG vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGG vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGG achieves a 71.17% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.


AVGG

1D
-0.88%
1M
29.67%
YTD
71.17%
6M
37.06%
1Y
161.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.20%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.91%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGG vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGG and QTJL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2025

0.54

The correlation between AVGG and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGG vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGG
AVGG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AVGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGG vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGGQTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.08

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

16.23

-9.48

AVGG vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGG and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGGQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.06

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

0.52

+1.99

Drawdowns

AVGG vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGG drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGG and QTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGGQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-33.40%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

-6.68%

-47.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.01%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-7.94%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

1.27%

+22.82%

Volatility

AVGG vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) has a higher volatility of 23.84% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that AVGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGGQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.84%

0.31%

+23.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.82%

7.61%

+54.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.10%

10.01%

+76.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.79%

20.42%

+64.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.79%

20.42%

+64.37%

AVGG vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGG vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

AVGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGG and QTJL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGG has higher volatility (23.84%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGG dropped -53.77% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

On 1-year performance, AVGG leads with 161.88% vs 20.52% for QTJL. On fees, AVGG is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGG has performed better with a 161.88% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGG is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

AVGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for AVGG and 0.79% for QTJL.

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGG and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer