PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGE vs. NZAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGE vs. NZAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All Equity Markets ETF (AVGE) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGE achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than NZAC's 8.05% return.


AVGE

1D
0.69%
1M
1.73%
6M
12.75%
YTD
15.76%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
10Y*

NZAC

1D
0.89%
1M
2.08%
6M
6.86%
YTD
8.05%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGE vs. NZAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVGE
Avantis All Equity Markets ETF
15.76%20.84%13.96%19.04%11.83%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
8.05%20.55%16.67%23.22%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGE and NZAC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022

0.89

The correlation between AVGE and NZAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGE vs. NZAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGE
AVGE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
AVGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NZAC
NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGE vs. NZAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets ETF (AVGE) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGENZACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.86

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

7.63

+5.84

AVGE vs. NZAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the NZAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGE and NZAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGE vs. NZAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGE drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum NZAC drawdown of -33.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGE and NZAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGENZACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-33.72%

+16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-10.10%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-16.19%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.53%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-5.30%

+2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.46%

-0.41%

Volatility

AVGE vs. NZAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All Equity Markets ETF (AVGE) is 4.22%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that AVGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NZAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGENZACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.54%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

11.44%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

13.68%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.95%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

17.06%

-1.84%

AVGE vs. NZAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than NZAC's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVGE vs. NZAC - Dividend Comparison

AVGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than NZAC's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGE
Avantis All Equity Markets ETF
1.41%1.67%1.92%1.93%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NZAC
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
2.05%1.90%1.88%1.65%1.81%1.62%1.59%2.17%2.53%2.20%2.00%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AVGE and NZAC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NZAC has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to AVGE (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGE dropped -17.13% vs NZAC's -33.72%.

On 3-year performance, AVGE leads with 20.46% vs 18.11% for NZAC. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, AVGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVGE has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 18.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for AVGE.

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.41% for AVGE.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AVGE and 0.12% for NZAC.

AVGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGE and NZAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer