PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVEM vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVEM vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.


AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.59%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%5.16%14.39%11.13%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%11.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEM and KEMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.90

The correlation between AVEM and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVEM vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVEM
KEMX

Technology

32.3%
41.2%

Financial Services

20.7%
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.4%

Industrials

9.2%
8.6%

Basic Materials

8.1%
8.2%

Communication Services

5.4%
3.2%

Energy

5.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
3.0%

Healthcare

2.8%
1.7%

Utilities

2.6%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.2%

Technology

AVEM
32.3%
KEMX
41.2%

Financial Services

AVEM
20.7%
KEMX
20.7%

Consumer Cyclical

AVEM
9.2%
KEMX
5.4%

Industrials

AVEM
9.2%
KEMX
8.6%

Basic Materials

AVEM
8.1%
KEMX
8.2%

Communication Services

AVEM
5.4%
KEMX
3.2%

Energy

AVEM
5.1%
KEMX
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

AVEM
3.1%
KEMX
3.0%

Healthcare

AVEM
2.8%
KEMX
1.7%

Utilities

AVEM
2.6%
KEMX
2.0%

Real Estate

AVEM
1.6%
KEMX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVEM vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVEMKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.62

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

5.24

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

20.86

-4.16

AVEM vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVEMKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

3.59

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.68

-0.03

Drawdowns

AVEM vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVEMKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-38.80%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

-15.36%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-19.62%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

-30.85%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-1.31%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-8.86%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.85%

-0.55%

Volatility

AVEM vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) is 8.33%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that AVEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVEMKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

9.86%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

19.90%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

22.40%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

18.21%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

20.94%

-0.39%

AVEM vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVEM vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than KEMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, AVEM and KEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to AVEM (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 9.92% for AVEM. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.98% for AVEM.

AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVEM and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer