AVEM vs. EDIV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. AVEM is actively managed, while EDIV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVEM returned 9.50%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for EDIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVEM charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EDIV.

Performance

AVEM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 23.75% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 5.93% return.

AVEM

• 1D: -5.47%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 23.75%
• 6M: 24.18%
• 1Y: 46.12%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: —

EDIV

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 17.91%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	23.75%	34.48%	7.49%	15.30%	-18.15%	5.16%	14.39%	10.40%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	5.93%	16.45%	12.75%	41.91%	-15.31%	11.21%	-9.95%	4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEM and EDIV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019	0.82

The correlation between AVEM and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVEM vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVEM	EDIV
Technology	39.5%	6.8%
Financial Services	18.6%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	7.6%
Industrials	8.1%	6.4%
Basic Materials	7.3%	0.9%
Communication Services	4.9%	5.2%
Energy	4.3%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	9.3%
Healthcare	2.5%	0.6%
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.8%

Return for Risk

AVEM vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM

AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 68
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

EDIV

EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 31
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVEM	EDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.12	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	1.64	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.21	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	1.37	+2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.36	4.08	+9.28

AVEM vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVEM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and EDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVEM	EDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-53.36%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-10.36%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-13.84%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	-28.32%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.47%	-4.51%	-0.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.04%	-19.31%	+9.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	3.46%	0.00%

Volatility

AVEM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a higher volatility of 12.55% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.81%. This indicates that AVEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVEM	EDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.55%	4.81%	+7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.07%	10.71%	+9.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.23%	12.67%	+9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.99%	13.91%	+5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	17.38%	+3.53%

AVEM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVEM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than EDIV's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.62%	2.45%	3.17%	3.06%	2.77%	2.61%	1.60%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF	4.28%	4.69%	3.94%	4.26%	4.94%	3.84%	3.52%	3.83%	3.41%	2.99%	4.94%	5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVEM and EDIV in my portfolio?

AVEM and EDIV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVEM or EDIV?

AVEM has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to EDIV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

Which ETF is better, AVEM or EDIV?

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 10.98% vs 9.50% for AVEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVEM or EDIV?

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 9.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVEM or EDIV?

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVEM or EDIV?

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.62% for AVEM.

What is the main difference between AVEM and EDIV?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.49% for EDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.