PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVEM vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVEM vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.


AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
27.59%34.48%7.49%15.30%-18.15%5.16%14.39%11.13%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEM and CIL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.62

The correlation between AVEM and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVEM vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVEM
CIL

Technology

32.3%
6.4%

Financial Services

20.7%
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.2%

Industrials

9.2%
18.4%

Basic Materials

8.1%
6.6%

Communication Services

5.4%
5.8%

Energy

5.1%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

2.8%
7.7%

Utilities

2.6%
6.6%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.2%

Technology

AVEM
32.3%
CIL
6.4%

Financial Services

AVEM
20.7%
CIL
24.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AVEM
9.2%
CIL
8.2%

Industrials

AVEM
9.2%
CIL
18.4%

Basic Materials

AVEM
8.1%
CIL
6.6%

Communication Services

AVEM
5.4%
CIL
5.8%

Energy

AVEM
5.1%
CIL
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

AVEM
3.1%
CIL
8.8%

Healthcare

AVEM
2.8%
CIL
7.7%

Utilities

AVEM
2.6%
CIL
6.6%

Real Estate

AVEM
1.6%
CIL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVEM vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVEMCILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.49

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.95

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.70

16.75

-0.05

AVEM vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVEMCILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.24

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.46

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.43

+0.22

Drawdowns

AVEM vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVEMCILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-36.27%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

-4.60%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-11.96%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

-29.89%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-0.58%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-6.56%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.07%

+2.23%

Volatility

AVEM vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that AVEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVEMCILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

0.00%

+8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

4.23%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

8.19%

+11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

16.49%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

17.17%

+3.38%

AVEM vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVEM vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVEM and CIL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.92% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.45% for CIL.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVEM and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer