AVEM vs. CIL
AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - AVEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVEM returned 9.92%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for CIL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVEM charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.
Performance
AVEM vs. CIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
AVEM vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 5.44% | 32.99% | 3.76% | 16.29% | -16.00% | 11.07% | 7.21% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVEM and CIL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between AVEM and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVEM vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVEM
CIL
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVEM
CIL
Financial Services
AVEM
CIL
Consumer Cyclical
AVEM
CIL
Industrials
AVEM
CIL
Basic Materials
AVEM
CIL
Communication Services
AVEM
CIL
Energy
AVEM
CIL
Consumer Defensive
AVEM
CIL
Healthcare
AVEM
CIL
Utilities
AVEM
CIL
Real Estate
AVEM
CIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVEM vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank
AVEM
CIL
AVEM vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.49 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.95 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 16.75 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 2.24 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
AVEM vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and CIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -36.27% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -4.60% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -11.96% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.00% | -29.89% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.58% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -6.56% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 1.07% | +2.23% |
Volatility
AVEM vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that AVEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVEM | CIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 0.00% | +8.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.72% | 4.23% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 8.19% | +11.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 16.49% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 17.17% | +3.38% |
AVEM vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVEM vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison
AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF | 1.67% | 2.70% | 3.46% | 2.91% | 2.41% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVEM and CIL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs CIL's -36.27%.
On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.92% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.
AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.45% for CIL.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVEM and CIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer