PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 14.36% return.


AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

RLY

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
14.36%
6M
16.24%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
14.36%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and RLY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between AVDV and RLY has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AVDV vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDV
RLY

Basic Materials

22.5%
25.1%

Industrials

21.3%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
2.6%

Financial Services

13.7%
0.0%

Energy

10.8%
30.1%

Technology

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.1%
0.8%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.7%
15.9%

Real Estate

1.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

AVDV
22.5%
RLY
25.1%

Industrials

AVDV
21.3%
RLY
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

AVDV
14.4%
RLY
2.6%

Financial Services

AVDV
13.7%
RLY
0.0%

Energy

AVDV
10.8%
RLY
30.1%

Technology

AVDV
6.4%
RLY

-

Consumer Defensive

AVDV
3.4%
RLY
3.6%

Healthcare

AVDV
2.1%
RLY
0.8%

Communication Services

AVDV
2.0%
RLY

-

Utilities

AVDV
1.7%
RLY
15.9%

Real Estate

AVDV
1.1%
RLY
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVDVRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

7.16

-4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

25.86

-13.52

AVDV vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVDVRLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.73

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.73

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.36

+0.41

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than RLY's maximum drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-37.75%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-3.93%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-10.08%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-18.94%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-3.93%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-9.45%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.09%

+2.17%

Volatility

AVDV vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.47%. This indicates that AVDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

3.47%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

8.46%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

10.34%

+5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

13.57%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

13.83%

+5.92%

AVDV vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than RLY's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.93%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDV and RLY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to RLY (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs RLY's -37.75%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.33% vs 9.85% for RLY. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.81% for AVDV.

AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.50% for RLY.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer