AVDV vs. COST
AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, AVDV returned 13.33%/yr vs 22.05%/yr for COST. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AVDV vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVDV having a 13.22% return and COST slightly higher at 13.35%.
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 40.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
AVDV vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 13.22% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVDV and COST is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.29 |
The correlation between AVDV and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVDV vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
AVDV
COST
AVDV vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVDV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.98 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.22 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | -0.51 | +12.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVDV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | -0.18 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.98 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
AVDV vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVDV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.01% | -53.39% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -15.38% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -20.74% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -31.40% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -10.93% | +7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -13.36% | +6.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 7.15% | -3.89% |
Volatility
AVDV vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 5.49%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVDV | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 7.71% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 14.53% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 18.79% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 22.71% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 21.95% | -2.20% |
Dividends
AVDV vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVDV and COST have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs COST's -53.39%.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVDV and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer