AVDV vs. BTGD
AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) and BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVDV returned 40.16% vs -31.91% for BTGD. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVDV charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BTGD.
Performance
AVDV vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 13.22%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 40.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- —
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 13.22% | 49.37% | -3.44% |
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVDV and BTGD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.46 |
The correlation between AVDV and BTGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVDV vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank
AVDV
BTGD
AVDV vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVDV | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.93 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | -0.60 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | -1.29 | +13.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVDV | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | -0.57 | +3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.19 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
AVDV vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and BTGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVDV | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.01% | -53.31% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -53.31% | +40.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -50.77% | +47.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -14.85% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 24.72% | -21.46% |
Volatility
AVDV vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 5.49%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVDV | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 14.85% | -9.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 46.45% | -32.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 56.04% | -40.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 55.94% | -38.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 55.94% | -36.19% |
AVDV vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVDV vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison
AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% |
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVDV and BTGD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs BTGD's -53.31%.
On 1-year performance, AVDV leads with 40.16% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 40.16% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.81% for AVDV.
AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 1.00% for BTGD.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVDV and BTGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer