PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVAAX vs. AGRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio (AVAAX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVAAX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than AGRFX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AVAAX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.62% annualized return.


AVAAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.78%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
1.97%

AGRFX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.96%
YTD
7.76%
6M
6.50%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
21.48%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
16.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVAAX
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio
1.60%4.95%1.50%5.23%-9.38%2.13%4.52%7.09%0.47%5.02%
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
7.76%10.84%31.50%37.95%-29.65%21.40%35.97%31.11%3.75%33.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AVAAX and AGRFX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 1994

-0.03

The correlation between AVAAX and AGRFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVAAX vs. AGRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVAAX
AVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

AGRFX
AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio (AVAAX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVAAXAGRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.22

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.18

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

4.22

+4.01

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the AGRFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVAAX and AGRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVAAXAGRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

1.21

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.58

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.81

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.58

+0.62

Drawdowns

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVAAX drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, smaller than the maximum AGRFX drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAAX and AGRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVAAXAGRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.11%

-61.88%

+47.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-15.92%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-22.08%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.11%

-35.21%

+21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.11%

-35.21%

+21.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.66%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-15.76%

+14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

4.45%

-3.60%

Volatility

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio (AVAAX) is 1.10%, while AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that AVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVAAXAGRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

3.40%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

11.91%

-9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

15.59%

-12.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.92%

20.84%

-16.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

20.46%

-16.69%

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVAAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVAAX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison

AVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than AGRFX's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGRFX
AB Growth Fund
15.20%16.37%21.03%7.20%1.69%9.79%5.79%7.80%16.01%9.33%1.03%9.76%
AVAAX
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio
3.12%4.10%2.83%2.36%2.21%1.67%2.35%2.94%3.11%2.98%3.10%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVAAX and AGRFX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGRFX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to AVAAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVAAX dropped -14.11% vs AGRFX's -61.88%.

AVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVAAX and AGRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer