PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVA vs. AES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVA vs. AES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avista Corporation (AVA) and The AES Corporation (AES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVA achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than AES's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AVA has underperformed AES with an annualized return of 3.72%, while AES has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return.


AVA

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
8.08%
6M
8.44%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
3.72%

AES

1D
0.34%
1M
0.14%
YTD
5.00%
6M
8.33%
1Y
52.27%
3Y*
-6.03%
5Y*
-7.19%
10Y*
6.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVA vs. AES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVA
Avista Corporation
8.08%10.68%7.84%-15.31%8.79%10.27%-13.10%17.28%-15.07%32.87%
AES
The AES Corporation
5.00%18.26%-30.40%-30.88%21.69%5.94%22.16%42.14%39.02%-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AVA and AES is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 1991

0.29

The correlation between AVA and AES shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AVA:

$2.53

AES:

$1.97

PE Ratio

AVA:

16.09

AES:

7.48

PEG Ratio

AVA:

5.24

AES:

0.04

PS Ratio

AVA:

2.46

AES:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVA:

$1.35B

AES:

$12.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVA:

$711.00M

AES:

$1.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVA:

$455.00M

AES:

$2.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVA vs. AES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVA
AVA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVA vs. AES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avista Corporation (AVA) and The AES Corporation (AES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVAAESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.36

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.77

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.01

5.11

-2.10

AVA vs. AES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the AES Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVA and AES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVA vs. AES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVA drawdown since its inception was -78.86%, smaller than the maximum AES drawdown of -98.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVA and AES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVAAESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.86%

-98.65%

+19.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-18.98%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.43%

-53.33%

+32.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-63.43%

+34.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.17%

-63.43%

+26.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-62.03%

+57.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.81%

-57.02%

+35.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

10.26%

-6.31%

Volatility

AVA vs. AES - Volatility Comparison

Avista Corporation (AVA) has a higher volatility of 8.38% compared to The AES Corporation (AES) at 0.98%. This indicates that AVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVAAESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

0.98%

+7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

25.36%

-10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

41.64%

-23.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.64%

37.73%

-16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.54%

36.04%

-10.50%

Dividends

AVA vs. AES - Dividend Comparison

AVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, which matches AES's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation
4.79%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
AVA
Avista Corporation
4.83%5.09%5.19%5.15%3.97%3.98%4.04%3.22%3.51%2.78%3.43%3.73%

Financials

AVA vs. AES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Avista Corporation and The AES Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B202220232024202520260
3.18B
(AVA) Total Revenue
(AES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AVA and AES have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVA has higher volatility (8.38%) compared to AES (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVA dropped -78.86% vs AES's -98.65%.

AES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVA and AES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer