PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUUIX vs. AWF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUUIX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Select US Equity Portfolio (AUUIX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUUIX achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, AUUIX has outperformed AWF with an annualized return of 16.26%, while AWF has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return.


AUUIX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.40%
YTD
9.98%
6M
10.23%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
22.22%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
16.26%

AWF

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
5.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUUIX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUUIX
AB Select US Equity Portfolio
9.98%18.82%26.19%19.01%-13.54%30.14%15.08%40.72%-4.70%22.55%
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund
-1.70%7.54%14.30%18.37%-16.62%9.95%4.40%23.40%-11.35%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between AUUIX and AWF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2011

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUUIX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUUIX
AUUIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AUUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AUUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AWF
AWF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUUIX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Select US Equity Portfolio (AUUIX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUUIXAWFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

0.16

+2.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

0.29

+3.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.04

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

0.14

+3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.17

0.33

+13.84

AUUIX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUUIX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUUIXAWFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

0.16

+2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.35

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.38

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.31

+0.64

Drawdowns

AUUIX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUUIX drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUUIX and AWF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUUIXAWFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.57%

-55.54%

+22.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-10.19%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-11.12%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.16%

-25.25%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.57%

-40.12%

+7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.81%

+5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.62%

-12.31%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

4.26%

-2.35%

Volatility

AUUIX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Select US Equity Portfolio (AUUIX) is 2.50%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that AUUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUUIXAWFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

3.53%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.77%

7.25%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

8.70%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

12.11%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

15.22%

+2.72%

AUUIX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUUIX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUUIX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

AUUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than AWF's 7.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUUIX
AB Select US Equity Portfolio
5.51%6.05%8.89%2.38%6.60%24.03%3.32%15.74%12.45%11.26%4.16%8.18%
AWF
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund
7.68%7.81%7.47%7.33%10.30%6.48%6.68%6.62%7.97%6.03%7.73%10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUUIX and AWF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AWF has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to AUUIX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUUIX dropped -32.57% vs AWF's -55.54%.

AUUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUUIX and AWF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer