AUTL vs. VRIG
AUTL (Autolus Therapeutics plc) is a stock, while VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 5 years, AUTL returned -23.91%/yr vs 4.42%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AUTL vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUTL achieves a -18.59% return, which is significantly lower than VRIG's 1.81% return.
AUTL
- 1D
- -7.43%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- -18.59%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- -21.74%
- 3Y*
- -17.64%
- 5Y*
- -23.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
AUTL vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTL Autolus Therapeutics plc | -18.59% | -15.32% | -63.51% | 238.95% | -63.39% | -41.95% | -32.27% | -59.81% | 31.36% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.81% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUTL and VRIG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018 | 0.05 |
The correlation between AUTL and VRIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUTL vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
AUTL
VRIG
AUTL vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUTL | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 5.38 | -4.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 62.75 | -63.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 320.64 | -321.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUTL | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 10.15 | -10.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 3.45 | -3.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.91 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
AUTL vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUTL drawdown since its inception was -97.63%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUTL and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUTL | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.63% | -13.04% | -84.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.85% | -0.08% | -54.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.36% | -0.78% | -83.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.68% | -2.28% | -83.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.63% | -0.00% | -96.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.25% | -0.27% | -80.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.75% | 0.02% | +38.73% |
Volatility
AUTL vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) has a higher volatility of 23.55% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.11%. This indicates that AUTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUTL | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.55% | 0.11% | +23.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.52% | 0.36% | +52.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.72% | 0.49% | +75.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.73% | 1.29% | +76.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.84% | 3.80% | +77.04% |
Dividends
AUTL vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
AUTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTL Autolus Therapeutics plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUTL and VRIG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AUTL has higher volatility (23.55%) compared to VRIG (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUTL dropped -97.63% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.15 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUTL and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer