AUSM vs. SCMB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) and SCMB (Schwab Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. AUSM is actively managed, while SCMB is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AUSM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCMB.

Performance

AUSM vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSM achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than SCMB's 1.39% return.

AUSM

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCMB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 3.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSM vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF	1.18%	1.58%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	1.39%	4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSM and SCMB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

AUSM vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCMB

SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 63
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSM vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUSM	SCMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.15	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.06	—

Drawdowns

AUSM vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSM drawdown since its inception was -0.42%, smaller than the maximum SCMB drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSM and SCMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUSM	SCMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-6.13%	+5.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.56%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.09%	-1.31%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AUSM	SCMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75%	2.89%	-2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.75%	4.14%	-3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.75%	4.14%	-3.39%

AUSM vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AUSM vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

AUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than SCMB's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF	2.39%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF	3.52%	3.36%	3.34%	3.10%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUSM and SCMB in my portfolio?

AUSM and SCMB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AUSM or SCMB?

On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUSM or SCMB?

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AUSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUSM or SCMB?

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

What is the main difference between AUSM and SCMB?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AUSM and 0.03% for SCMB.