PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSM vs. MUNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSM vs. MUNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSM achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than MUNI's 1.79% return.


AUSM

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.32%
YTD
1.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUNI

1D
0.08%
1M
0.46%
6M
1.71%
YTD
1.79%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSM vs. MUNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUSM and MUNI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSM vs. MUNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSM vs. MUNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUSMMUNIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

AUSM vs. MUNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUSM vs. MUNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSM drawdown since its inception was -0.42%, smaller than the maximum MUNI drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSM and MUNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSMMUNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-11.15%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.73%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

Volatility

AUSM vs. MUNI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSMMUNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74%

2.23%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.74%

3.32%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.74%

3.84%

-3.10%

AUSM vs. MUNI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MUNI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUSM vs. MUNI - Dividend Comparison

AUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than MUNI's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSM
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF
2.61%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.30%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSM and MUNI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MUNI.

MUNI has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.61% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AUSM and 0.35% for MUNI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSM and MUNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer