AUNYX vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
AUNYX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy | 0.39% | 5.19% | 2.36% | 5.17% | -4.84% | 7.30% | 4.58% | 6.74% | -0.07% | 2.19% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUNYX achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than LSMSX's -0.27% return.
AUNYX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUNYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUNYX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
AUNYX
LSMSX
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUNYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 0.67 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 0.89 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.71 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 1.98 | +3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUNYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.67 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.25 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.58 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUNYX and LSMSX is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
AUNYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy | 3.29% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 2.44% | 1.64% | 1.66% | 2.37% | 2.86% | 2.64% | 2.13% | 2.01% | 1.90% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUNYX drawdown since its inception was -14.10%, smaller than the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUNYX and LSMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUNYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.10% | -15.00% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -6.21% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.44% | -15.00% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -2.62% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -2.88% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 2.21% | -1.41% |
Volatility
AUNYX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) have volatilities of 1.10% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUNYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 1.60% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 5.78% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.40% | 4.44% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.58% | 4.52% | -0.94% |