AUGZ vs. UXJA
AUGZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. AUGZ is passively managed, while UXJA is actively managed. Over the past year, AUGZ returned 17.35% vs 25.34% for UXJA. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AUGZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJA.
Performance
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUGZ achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 14.20% return.
AUGZ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.90%
UXJA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 25.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $31.48K | $48.37K | $250.29K | |
| $50.11K | $64.18K | $76.75K |
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 9.60% | 11.55% |
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January | 14.20% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGZ and UXJA is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025 | 0.96 |
The correlation between AUGZ and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGZ vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank
AUGZ
UXJA
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUGZ | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.59 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 10.21 | -0.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGZ drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGZ and UXJA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGZ | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -20.01% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -9.83% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.11% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -2.88% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 2.49% | -0.62% |
Volatility
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) is 3.50%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that AUGZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGZ | UXJA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 4.64% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 11.35% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 14.58% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 18.40% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 18.40% | -6.26% |
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUGZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUGZ vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison
AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while UXJA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 3.31% | 3.63% | 4.08% | 3.42% | 0.41% |
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AUGZ and UXJA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
UXJA has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to AUGZ (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGZ dropped -15.67% vs UXJA's -20.01%.
On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 25.34% vs 17.35% for AUGZ. On fees, AUGZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AUGZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 25.34% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUGZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJA.
AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.00% for UXJA.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AUGZ and 0.85% for UXJA.
UXJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUGZ and UXJA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer