PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUGZ vs. QBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUGZ vs. QBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than QBER's -0.96% return.


AUGZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.32%
YTD
8.27%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*

QBER

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
-0.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGZ vs. QBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
8.27%13.49%5.53%
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
-0.96%0.25%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGZ and QBER is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

-0.50

The correlation between AUGZ and QBER has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUGZ vs. QBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGZ
AUGZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AUGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

QBER
QBER Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBER Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBER Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGZ vs. QBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUGZQBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.96

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

-0.36

+3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

-0.88

+13.34

AUGZ vs. QBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the QBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGZ and QBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUGZQBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

-0.23

+2.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

-0.05

+1.14

Drawdowns

AUGZ vs. QBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGZ drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, which is greater than QBER's maximum drawdown of -5.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGZ and QBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUGZQBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-5.72%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-2.35%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-5.68%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-4.72%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.97%

+0.71%

Volatility

AUGZ vs. QBER - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF (QBER) at 0.87%. This indicates that AUGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUGZQBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

0.87%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

2.85%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

3.64%

+5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

6.40%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.10%

6.40%

+5.70%

AUGZ vs. QBER - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AUGZ and QBER have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

AUGZ vs. QBER - Dividend Comparison

AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than QBER's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
3.35%3.63%4.08%3.42%0.41%
QBER
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF
3.29%3.26%1.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUGZ and QBER have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUGZ has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to QBER (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGZ dropped -15.67% vs QBER's -5.72%.

On 1-year performance, AUGZ leads with 20.84% vs -0.85% for QBER. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, QBER has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AUGZ has performed better with a 20.84% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUGZ and QBER have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 3.29% for QBER.

AUGZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QBER is Options Trading.

AUGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUGZ and QBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer