AUGZ vs. KFEB
AUGZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF) and KFEB (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February) are both Defined Outcome funds. AUGZ is passively managed, while KFEB is actively managed. Over the past year, AUGZ returned 20.84% vs 24.53% for KFEB. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUGZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than KFEB's 11.46% return.
AUGZ
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- —
KFEB
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 8.27% | 10.09% |
KFEB Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February | 11.46% | 8.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGZ and KFEB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between AUGZ and KFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGZ vs. KFEB — Risk / Return Rank
AUGZ
KFEB
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUGZ | KFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 4.25 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.46 | 15.46 | -3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUGZ | KFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.25 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGZ drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, which is greater than KFEB's maximum drawdown of -14.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGZ and KFEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGZ | KFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | -14.16% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | -5.80% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.57% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -2.33% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 1.59% | +0.09% |
Volatility
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) at 2.41%. This indicates that AUGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGZ | KFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.41% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 7.71% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 10.99% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.97% | 13.27% | -1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 13.27% | -1.17% |
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUGZ and KFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
AUGZ vs. KFEB - Dividend Comparison
AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while KFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 3.35% | 3.63% | 4.08% | 3.42% | 0.41% |
KFEB Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUGZ and KFEB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AUGZ has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to KFEB (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGZ dropped -15.67% vs KFEB's -14.16%.
On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 24.53% vs 20.84% for AUGZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 24.53% return vs 20.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUGZ and KFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for KFEB.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.
KFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUGZ and KFEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer