AUGW vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AUGW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AUGW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGW returned 11.37% vs 69.91% for NFXS. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. AUGW charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

AUGW vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGW achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 26.00% return.

AUGW

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 3.98%
• 1Y: 11.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: 23.02%
• YTD: 26.00%
• 6M: 25.81%
• 1Y: 69.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGW vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AUGW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF	4.18%	11.19%	1.67%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	26.00%	-8.56%	-21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGW and NFXS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.34

The correlation between AUGW and NFXS shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (all time) to -0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AUGW vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGW

AUGW Risk / Return Rank: 89
AUGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AUGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AUGW Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AUGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AUGW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 63
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGW vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGW	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.08	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	2.72	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.39	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	2.24	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.37	6.13	+13.24

AUGW vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGW and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUGW vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum NFXS drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGW and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGW	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-50.37%	+41.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.20%	-31.31%	+28.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-11.63%	+11.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-31.89%	+31.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	11.44%	-10.85%

Volatility

AUGW vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) is 0.82%, while Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that AUGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGW	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.82%	7.76%	-6.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.39%	26.25%	-22.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.52%	33.78%	-29.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	34.63%	-27.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.71%	34.63%	-27.92%

AUGW vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUGW vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

AUGW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AUGW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	2.81%	3.53%	0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGW and NFXS in my portfolio?

AUGW and NFXS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUGW or NFXS?

NFXS has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to AUGW (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGW dropped -8.76% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, AUGW or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 69.91% vs 11.37% for AUGW. On fees, AUGW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AUGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUGW or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 69.91% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGW or NFXS?

AUGW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for NFXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGW or NFXS?

NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for AUGW.

What is the main difference between AUGW and NFXS?

AUGW is categorized as Options Trading, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for AUGW and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.