AUGP vs. PMAU
AUGP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August) and PMAU (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
AUGP vs. PMAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUGP achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than PMAU's 3.05% return.
AUGP
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 17.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMAU
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUGP vs. PMAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AUGP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August | 5.54% | 5.95% |
PMAU PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August | 3.05% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGP and PMAU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGP vs. PMAU — Risk / Return Rank
AUGP
PMAU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AUGP vs. PMAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August (AUGP) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUGP | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUGP vs. PMAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGP drawdown since its inception was -12.03%, which is greater than PMAU's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGP and PMAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGP | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -1.79% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -0.13% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -0.17% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility
AUGP vs. PMAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGP | PMAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.77% | 2.48% | +4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 2.48% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.59% | 2.48% | +7.11% |
AUGP vs. PMAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUGP and PMAU have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
AUGP vs. PMAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUGP nor PMAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, AUGP and PMAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUGP and PMAU have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
AUGP and PMAU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for AUGP and PMAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer