AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L
AUCP.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) and XGDU.L (Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both Precious Metals funds - AUCP.L tracks the STOXX Global Gold Miners while XGDU.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUCP.L returned 23.58%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for XGDU.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUCP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XGDU.L.
Performance
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AUCP.L is traded in GBp, while XGDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XGDU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUCP.L achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than XGDU.L's 4.19% return.
AUCP.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 65.77%
- 3Y*
- 46.06%
- 5Y*
- 23.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.41%
XGDU.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -0.57% | 161.99% | 20.20% | 8.69% | -4.04% | -8.91% | -0.91% |
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 4.19% | 52.97% | 28.40% | 7.78% | 11.98% | -3.90% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCP.L and XGDU.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between AUCP.L and XGDU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUCP.L
XGDU.L
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUCP.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.90 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 5.03 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUCP.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.39 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.19 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.94 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than XGDU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCP.L and XGDU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUCP.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.57% | -22.90% | -54.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -17.64% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -17.64% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.38% | -17.64% | -21.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.67% | -15.91% | -9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -6.61% | -29.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | 6.67% | +4.84% |
Volatility
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a higher volatility of 13.97% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) at 5.97%. This indicates that AUCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUCP.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.97% | 5.97% | +8.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 21.20% | +12.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.95% | 24.12% | +19.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 16.76% | +19.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 16.83% | +17.83% |
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUCP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUCP.L vs. XGDU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCP.L nor XGDU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AUCP.L and XGDU.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGDU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGDU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.
AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners, while XGDU.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AUCP.L and 0.12% for XGDU.L.
Find the right allocation for AUCP.L and XGDU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer