PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUCP.L achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than GBPC.L's 1.14% return.


AUCP.L

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.29%
YTD
-10.22%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
55.82%
3Y*
45.12%
5Y*
23.87%
10Y*
13.49%

GBPC.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.16%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.39%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
-0.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AUCP.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-10.22%161.99%20.20%8.69%-4.04%-8.91%1.69%
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.14%6.83%2.78%8.35%-17.11%-3.03%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AUCP.L and GBPC.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.23

The correlation between AUCP.L and GBPC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUCP.L
AUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUCP.LGBPC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.12

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

3.67

+0.43

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUCP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUCP.L and GBPC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than GBPC.L's maximum drawdown of -28.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCP.L and GBPC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUCP.LGBPC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-28.45%

-53.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.61%

-4.14%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.61%

-4.14%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.38%

-27.69%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.88%

-3.70%

-29.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-10.82%

-35.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

1.27%

+12.33%

Volatility

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a higher volatility of 17.90% compared to L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) at 1.44%. This indicates that AUCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUCP.LGBPC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.90%

1.44%

+16.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.14%

5.14%

+32.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.44%

6.24%

+40.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.29%

7.85%

+31.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.09%

7.59%

+28.50%

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUCP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPC.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUCP.L vs. GBPC.L - Dividend Comparison

AUCP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AUCP.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.09%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUCP.L and GBPC.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.

AUCP.L is categorized as Gold, while GBPC.L is European Corporate Bonds. AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners, while GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AUCP.L and 0.09% for GBPC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUCP.L and GBPC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer