AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L
AUCO.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) and SGLP.L (Invesco Physical Gold A) are both Gold funds - AUCO.L tracks the STOXX Global Gold Miners Index while SGLP.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L returned 13.80%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for SGLP.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUCO.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLP.L.
Performance
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AUCO.L is traded in USD, while SGLP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUCO.L achieves a -9.57% return, which is significantly lower than SGLP.L's -5.46% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L has outperformed SGLP.L with an annualized return of 13.80%, while SGLP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.
AUCO.L
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- -9.57%
- 6M
- -14.11%
- 1Y
- 53.11%
- 3Y*
- 49.15%
- 5Y*
- 23.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.80%
SGLP.L
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -5.46%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- 1Y
- 22.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.44%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCO.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -9.57% | 181.83% | 17.96% | 15.02% | -14.30% | -10.12% | 21.72% | 44.14% | -10.42% | 10.00% |
SGLP.L Invesco Physical Gold A | -5.46% | 65.19% | 26.00% | 12.92% | -0.12% | -3.76% | 23.67% | 19.25% | -1.60% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCO.L and SGLP.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009 | 0.68 |
The correlation between AUCO.L and SGLP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUCO.L
SGLP.L
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUCO.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 0.92 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 2.63 | +1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.30%, which is greater than SGLP.L's maximum drawdown of -66.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and SGLP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUCO.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.30% | -66.38% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.92% | -24.51% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.92% | -24.51% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.62% | -24.51% | -24.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.47% | -24.51% | -29.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -23.29% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.75% | -39.72% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.11% | 8.60% | +5.51% |
Volatility
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a higher volatility of 18.91% compared to Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) at 8.58%. This indicates that AUCO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUCO.L | SGLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.91% | 8.58% | +10.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.30% | 22.14% | +17.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.02% | 25.14% | +22.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.69% | 22.70% | +15.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.65% | 18.79% | +16.86% |
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUCO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUCO.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCO.L nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AUCO.L and SGLP.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCO.L.
AUCO.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners Index, while SGLP.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AUCO.L and 0.12% for SGLP.L.
Find the right allocation for AUCO.L and SGLP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer